Home Cameras Digital Cameras Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3: because Sony’s a new camera...

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3: because Sony’s a new camera contender

Sony Xperia cameras have formerly felt a bit like being served bangers and crush by a Michelin star cook – ideally satisfying, nonetheless with a clever aftertaste of what competence have been.

Well, that’s all altered now with a Sony Xperia 1. The detailed menu’s been radically overhauled, with facilities like Eye AF and Zeiss optics, and Alpha tech is now baked into a whole sharpened experience.

Sony told me accurately since Xperia phones are finally removing Alpha-style cameras during MWC 2019, nonetheless a doubt now is – do all a changes pierce a Xperia 1 adult to speed with a likes of Google’s Pixel 3?

I took one out on a (very rainy) outing to Venice with Google’s flagship phone to see how it fared in opposite sharpened situations, from portraits to low light.

And while I’d like to exam it some-more entirely outward of monsoon conditions, a early signs are that a Xperia 1 has, if not leapfrogged a tip smartphone cameras, positively finished itself a unequivocally appealing alternative. Particularly if we cite a some-more camera-like knowledge to a shining point-and-shoot morality of a Pixel…

Related: Best smartphone camera

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Portraits

Portrait sharpened should be one of a Xperia 1’s strengths, given a inclusion of Eye AF. And in my early knowledge this looks to be a case, with a shots containing healthy skin tones, lots of detail, and some decent (if not perfect) bokeh simulation.

Impressively, a Eye AF underline (which stands for Eye Autofocus) both finds and close onto eyes as fast as Sony’s Alpha cameras, imprinting them with a small shade square.

(Left) Sony Xperia 1 (f/2.4, 1.4000s, ISO 125), (Right) Google Pixel 3 (f/1.8, 1.2933s, ISO 62), 4.44mm

Given a impassioned abyss of margin on smartphone cameras, though, this block acts some-more like a pen for a Xperia’s bokeh simulation. On a Pixel 3, we can change both a volume of bokeh and a concentration indicate after you’ve taken a shot – so while Eye AF is an alleviation on prior Xperias, it isn’t a large advantage over a rivals either.

The Xperia 1’s dedicated Portrait mode also switches a 52mm lens, that means shots are taken during f/2.4 compared to a Pixel 3’s f/1.8. This doesn’t make many disproportion in good light, nonetheless I’ll be meddlesome to see how it affects a Xperia 1’s low light portraits.

Overall, both phones take glorious mural shots. The Xperia 1 shot above was taken with limit credentials blur, hence a impassioned subdivision between theme and background.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

And as a above shots show, a Xperia 1 goes for a warmer and some-more true-to-life demeanour compared to a some-more contrasty Pixel 3. As we’ll see, this is something of a repeated theme…

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – General shooting

As a point-and-shoot camera, a Xperia 1 performs good and offers a identical spin of flexibility to a rivals interjection to those dual additional lenses – a 52mm for 2x zoom, and a now requisite 16mm wide-angle lens.

Like a ‘Intelligent Auto’ mode on Sony’s cameras, a stage approval tells we on a shade what form of shot a camera’s recognized (for example, backlit or macro) and tweaks a settings accordingly.

Its stage approval isn’t as absolute as rivals like Samsung, Huawei and Google – for example, it doesn’t go as granular as recognising a ‘flower’ or ‘building’. But there is also a accessible ‘predictive capture’ underline that (if incited on) takes a detonate of 4 photos, including before we press a shutter, and gives a choice of that one’s best.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

Overall, though, a Xperia 1 feels some-more like it’s directed during those who like to try over a (albeit brilliant) hand-holding knowledge of Google’s Pixel 3. For example, there’s no auto-HDR mode in a categorical camera, nonetheless we can find it in primer mode, that lets we tweak all from shiver speed to bearing compensation.

Sadly, this primer mode is usually accessible for a 26mm categorical camera, rather than a wide-angle or 52mm lens, and there’s no approach to henceforth leave a camera in this mode, nonetheless it’s a useful one to have on standby.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

In terms print quality, a Xperia 1 puts in a good showing, with Sony’s flagship exposing a above stage a hold improved than a Pixel 3 – stand in on excellent sum though, and Google’s phone has reduction sound and aliasing.

It’s a identical story with a shot below, with a Pixel 3 winning out in terms of excellent fact and energetic operation (particularly on a vessel in a foreground), nonetheless not by many opposite a whole shot.

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Zoom

Google’s picture estimate and detailed A.I works wonders opposite a operation of sharpened situations, nonetheless one area where it can’t utterly overcome a stipulations of a singular lens is zoom.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

Like many flagship cameras, a Sony Xperia 1 has a lens with a longer focal length to give we a bit some-more strech (twice as much, in this case). That’s not utterly as considerable as a Huawei P30 Pro’s 135mm lens, nonetheless it’s a accessible apparatus to have in comparatively well-lit situations where we need to get closer to a movement nonetheless losing quality.

The Pixel 3’s Super Res Zoom is shining for a digital zoom, nonetheless it still can’t contest with a Xperia 1’s dedicated 52mm lens. Crop in on a rocks in this scene, and there’s noticeably some-more fact in a Xperia 1’s shot, with a Pixel compensating for a miss of operation by smudging out a tools it can’t resolve.

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Macro and food

Phones aren’t unequivocally designed for macro photography, with their lenses generally a bit too far-reaching to spike a close-up nonetheless a dedicated accessory.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

That said, both a Sony Xperia 1 and Google Pixel 3 did a decent pursuit with these dual scenes, with small to select between them.

Both phones’ autofocus did good with a categorical flower, with a good spin of fact on a petals and raindrops. The Xperia tends to be a small softer towards a edges, that is maybe due to a multiple of it sharpened far-reaching open during f/1.6 and also ramping adult a bokeh by default.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

It’s a identical story with this food shot, with good fact in a centre nonetheless incomparable density as we pierce towards a edges of a frame. One reward on a Xperia 1, though, is that if you’re struggling with focus, we can always go in primer mode and use MF rather than AF, an choice that isn’t accessible in a Pixel 3’s central camera app.

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Low light and night

One of a upgrades a Xperia 1 brings over a predecessors is a incomparable pixels, that are a same distance (1.4um) as a Google Pixel 3.

This isn’t a usually cause that contributes to low light performance, nonetheless a Xperia achieved flattering good in a dual indoor cafeteria scenes below.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

In a picture above, it didn’t control a highlights on a dual coffee cups as good as a Pixel 3, nonetheless differently constructed a unequivocally identical shot in terms of fact and white balance.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

Similarly, in this shot a fact levels and bearing are flattering many on a standard – it’s usually when we stand in that we can see a Pixel 3’s improved doing of picture noise, nonetheless this is usually unequivocally conspicuous with pixel peeping.

More obvious, though, is that a Google Pixel 3 is still undoubtedly a aristocrat when it comes to a intensely severe night shot.

The Pixel’s ‘Night Mode’ isn’t always one we spin to for realism, nonetheless if we need to rescue some sum from an roughly representation black stage and get a useable snap, afterwards it’s a pretence shot that we won’t find on a Xperia 1.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

In a above shot on dim vessel a Pixel 3 has rubbed a extremes of lighting improved than a cleared out Xperia 1, while in a stage next it’s finished a supernatural pursuit during pulling out a sum of a hotel’s interior, that has been totally blown out by a Sony phone.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Selfies

Like many front-facing smartphone cameras, a Xperia 1’s isn’t utterly as absolute as a back ones, with a smaller sensor and pixels.

There is a ‘portrait selfie’ mode, that contains all sorts of bokeh adjustments and face-warping. Strangely, there’s no Eye AF nonetheless (just face-tracking), and it feels like Sony’s missed a pretence here.

Sony Xperia 1 (left) vs Google Pixel 3 (right)

Of all a modes where Eye AF could be many useful, with unnatural bokeh assisting to defocus a distant side of your face, it’s in selfie mural mode. The Pixel 3 now doesn’t let we adjust credentials fuzz in selfie mode, so that could have been a good win for a Xperia 1.

Perhaps it’s coming, nonetheless for now there’s small to select between a dual phones, other than a slight colour heat disproportion and an additional lurch of heightening and contrariety in a Pixel 3.

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Video

One of a large focuses of a Xperia 1 is video, interjection to some closer partnership with Sony’s CineAlta team.

Perhaps some-more useful than a new Cinema Pro app, though, is a inclusion of visual and electronic stabilisation, that work together easily (as prolonged as you’re not sharpened in HDR) to well-spoken out any judder from walking or running.

In my early tests so distant (see below), a stabilisation and video peculiarity looks somewhat improved than on a Pixel 3. The Xperia 1 can’t fire 4K during 60fps like a iPhone XS, nonetheless we do get intent tracking and an HDR option.

Bear in mind, though, that a latter isn’t concordant with a stabilisation, so you’ll need to be holding it unequivocally solid or regulating a gimbal.

Right now, a Cinema Pro app, that is designed to let we fire in 21:9 regulating a operation of pro settings, workflows and ‘looks’ formed on Sony’s CineAlta heritage, is a bit of a work in progress.

For a start, there’s no stabilisation when sharpened in a app (because HDR is on by default), and some of a ‘looks’ are unequivocally clumsy and usually suitable for certain scenes.

I did suffer a ability to adjust primer concentration while recording, nonetheless a app became nonchalant on occasions and we can now usually fibre videos from a ‘project’ together rather than do elementary things like cut your clips.

Sony Xperia 1 vs Google Pixel 3 – Early camera verdict

The Sony Xperia 1 is a clever new contender in a super-hot smartphone camera space.

Sony has righteously focused on facilities like in-depth primer modes for stills and video to make a Xperia 1 something of an choice point-and-shoot for videographers and fans of normal standalone cameras. And it’s good to get a flexibility of a 52mm lens and wide-angle shots, like a one below.

Sony Xperia 1

It’s not nonetheless a finished essay and there are some somewhat irritating inconsistencies opposite a camera knowledge – no primer mode for wide-angle or wizz lenses, no Eye AF on a front camera, and no stabilisation in a Cinema Pro app or HDR video modes. The Pixel 3 also handles sound improved in many situations.

But a Xperia 1 is a good all-rounder with lots of potential. Its cost pushes it right into flagship territory, nonetheless given a issues Huawei is facing, it could good find a good as a ‘other’ camera choice between the Pixels, iPhones and Galaxys. We’ll pierce we a final outcome on a phone as a whole unequivocally soon.



Why we’re different