Home Blog Page 6932

0 215

Is this a trend?

After a New York Times published conform author Vanessa Friedman’s desirable square about “breaking up” with her Apple Watch, we searched a Web for identical stories. we found a few. Not as many as we expected.

Vanessa Friedman, New York Times. I am violation adult with my Apple Watch. The attribute was, notwithstanding all expectations, not what we needed. All a concentration on San Francisco and Apple’s subsequent large creation this week (streaming!) done me comprehend it was not personification my tune. Still, we will never bewail a weeks we spent together. They taught me some profitable truths about myself. Like, for example, that we do not wish to be tangible by a articulate indicate on my wrist. June 10, 2015

Jay Yarrow, BusinessInsider. After only over a month with a Apple Watch, I’m prepared to pierce on if someone wants to take it off my hands during a right price. June 4, 2015

Chris Walters, policygenius. “Do not put something that measures time onto a device that army a user to wait.” “Do not emanate a device that turns itself off regularly while a user is perplexing to use it.” In my world, these dual manners would be common clarity even to a baby. But during Apple meditative is different, and therefore a Apple Watch is a beautifully done intent that is essentially opposite to my pattern principles. And that’s why, after dual weeks of wearing an Apple Watch Sport model, I’m returning it. May 25, 2015

Mark Sullivan, VentureBeat. For me a Watch already had a few strikes opposite it before we even put it on. we generally don’t like to wear things around my wrist. we also had reservations about adding nonetheless another square of tech to my life with a intensity to confuse me even more… In a end, we motionless that a Apple Watch doesn’t utterly acquire a place on my wrist. While we conclude a superb pattern of both a hardware and a software, we unequivocally don’t skip a Watch when I’m not wearing it. May 15, 2015.

Colin Berkshire, TalkingPointz. I was one of a initial people to get an Apple Watch. Not startling given we have an iPhone 6 plus, use a retina MacBook Pro, and my bureau has a 27” iMac with a 5K display. I’m an Apple guy. So, of course, we purchased an Apple Watch. I hated it. Just positively hated it. Let me count a ways… I unequivocally could go on and on. we hated it. we found after a few days we was only not regulating it. Thank integrity for money-back policies. May 15, 2015

Ray Sharma, Toronto Globe and Mail. Before shopping an Apple Watch, we had hoped it would be a device that would truly safe us into a new Internet of Things universe and that it would outrider a new era of program development. But it wasn’t. May 14, 2015

Scott Kelby, Photoshop Insider. we can’t trust it has come to this, after not even dual full weeks, though we possibly have to dump my Apple watch and go behind to my Fossil watch, or I’m literally going to have to buy a 2nd Apple watch since a battery life emanate is ruining a whole Apple Watch knowledge for me. By carrying a 2nd watch, we could keep one on a charger, and afterwards any day or so barter a watches, so one would always be charged. I am not kidding. May 8, 2015

The square that struck a deepest chord was Friedman’s. By Saturday morning it had drawn 530 comments from New York Times’ readers. Their favorite (and mine):

“A good and essential argument. Brought to mind a line we saw recently, attributed to Ellen DeGeneres: ‘Do we have to know who’s happy and who’s straight? Can’t we only adore everybody and decider them by a automobile they drive?’” — Mark.

For a record, I’m returning a Watch that Apple loaned me. I’m gripping a one we bought.

Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter during @philiped. Read his Apple


coverage during fortune.com/ped or allow around his RSS feed.

0 198

PALO ALTO — Some compensate for deli sandwiches with a crack of their Internet-enabled wristwatches. Osama Bedier waves his phone.

The business who emporium during Mollie Stone’s Market, during a heart of California Avenue’s startup row, are increasingly selling groceries though money or credit cards.

“I haven’t carried around cards for a unequivocally prolonged time,” Bedier said. “I try to transport unequivocally light.”

These shoppers are still early adopting outliers — generally Bedier, a executive who ran Google Wallet before starting his possess association to build mobile remuneration terminals — though Apple, Google and Samsung are counting on them as bellwethers in a new quarrel to turn your inseparable practical wallet. And notwithstanding early insurgency from retailers and even consumers, movement is now building toward creation these tap-and-pay systems a widespread consumer habit.

A Google wallet mobile remuneration complement can be used by a new Apple Watch during Peets Coffee  Tea in San Jose, Calif., on Wednesday, Apr 29, 2015.

Apple this week announced enhancements to Apple Pay, that was introduced in a fall, and Google pronounced it will shortly launch Android Pay, a Google Wallet successor. Amazon forsaken out of a digital wallet competition progressing this year though could return. Samsung is about to enter a marketplace after selling Massachusetts-based LoopPay in February.

“What’s turn a bridgehead for large tech companies is relevance: How do we turn a essential partial of your life any day?” pronounced Bedier. Making a squeeze is “one of a few necessities we can’t live without,” he added.

Quietly fluttering and drumming a personal device to buy jeans or a burrito could one day turn as whole as a aged money register “cha-ching,” though tech companies contingency still overcome hurdles before they can convince consumers — and, only as importantly, a stores that sell to them — to proviso out captivating ribbon cards in preference of “near-field communication,” or NFC.

Pictured is a new mobile remuneration depot combined by a Palo Alto-based startup, Poynt.

“I’ve been profitable for a while with my phone,” pronounced Google CEO Larry Page, vocalization during a company’s annual shareholder assembly final week. “First time we compensate with a phone, and we don’t have to lift out your card, disaster with entering codes and signing things and so on, it’s a flattering good experience.”

Outside a gadget-loving universe of Silicon Valley, however, not that many Americans are emotional for that experience. Seventy-five percent of U.S. consumers who don’t use smartphones to make purchases have no enterprise to change that practice, desiring it’s easier to compensate with money or credit and withdraw cards, according to a Mar consult by a U.S. Federal Reserve.

“People still don’t see since they should worry with mobile payments when a small cosmetic credit label is only as easy,” pronounced Matt Schulz of CreditCards.com. “It’s distinct that people are a small demure since it represents a vital change to something we’ve been regulating in flattering most a same approach for decades.”

But a movement is relocating toward wider adoption. The biggest propeller of change could be an Oct deadline set by a U.S. credit label companies Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express. In a corner pierce to revoke credit label fraud, a companies wish retailers to switch over to enabling “chip-and-PIN” payments, usurpation cards that rest on integrated circuits and personal marker numbers rather than captivating stripes and hand-signed receipts.

While “chip-and-PIN” is opposite from a radio communication record adopted by Apple and Google, retailers who need to renovate their store terminals are expected to embody both systems. And an whole attention of digital remuneration innovators — from PayPal and San Jose standard-bearer VeriFone to startups such as Square and Bedier’s Poynt — are operative on removing improved terminals in time.

All of this is relocating toward a selling knowledge that could give Silicon Valley companies distant some-more information than they already have about consumer selling habits, pairing information collected online with real-world exchange that could be profitable to advertisers. Apple is also collecting from banks 15 cents from any $100 purchase, though Google will not acquire fees, according to news reports.

Resisting a pierce to a tap-and-pay models touted by Apple and Google are some of America’s biggest retailers, disturbed about ceding to tech companies a consumer profiles that advertisers covet. A consortium called a Merchant Customer Exchange, or MCX, that depends Walmart, Target, Kmart, CVS and other obvious brands as members, is operative on a possess app, CurrentC, that would concede smartphone users to indicate a QR formula to buy a product.

But a insurgency is display signs of fraying.

Google Wallet, introduced in 2011, never unequivocally took off since it arrived on a stage too early and “didn’t have a conduit relations to assistance put a record and program in any phone,” Bedier said. But today, Apple Pay and Google’s Android Pay have partnerships not only with vital wireless carriers and credit label companies though with a flourishing series of merchants, from Whole Foods to McDonald’s. Best Buy, a member of MCX, recently pennyless divided to partner with Google and Apple and accept their payments.

“I consider MCX has been cursed to destroy from a beginning,” pronounced Dana Stalder, a former PayPal executive and partner during try collateral organisation Matrix Partners. “I don’t consider they have a wherewithal to equivalent a momentum.”

Much like a arise of e-commerce purchases on desktop computers, Stalder pronounced a use of mobile payments will eventually strike a tipping indicate of businessman and consumer acceptance. Tokenization — that protects a person’s credit information from breaches by giving a singular formula to any transaction — and fingerprint scanning will be built into a smartphone remuneration systems, shortening fears about security.

And a preference is tough to match, he said. Stalder recently paid for a cooking during sequence grill Paul Martin’s regulating his phone and a same platform, OpenTable, he used to make a reservation.

“Never even talked to a waiter,” Stalder said. “He knew we had paid, and came over and said, ‘Thanks for coming.’ That was it.”

At a Mollie Stone’s in Palo Alto, what began as a handful of business 6 months ago has remade into “40 or 50 a day” who compensate with smartphones or watches, pronounced store manager John Garcia. He jokes that many of his business also wore Google Glass in a store before that initial eyewear “went out of style,” though this new trend appears to be some-more than a gimmick.

Contact Matt O’Brien during 408-920-5011. Follow him during Twitter.com/Mattoyeah.

0 130

Beats wanted to fill your home with wireless speakers that bending directly into a song streaming service, though a devise was possibly scrapped or put on an extended interregnum after Apple bought a company, according to Variety. Beats had reportedly designed on releasing an vast wireless orator for a vital room late final year and afterwards following that adult with smaller speakers for a kitchen and bedroom. The devise would have put it in an expanding and profitable market, directly in foe with Sonos — that expects to do $1 billion in sales this year — as good as a many other companies fervent to get in on it, including Samsung.

Does Apple caring about Beats’ hardware?

But Beats product only wasn’t working, according to Variety. The speaker, that reportedly would have used Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and NFC, is pronounced to have bumped into production issues. In particular, Variety reports that Beats wanted to build a speaker’s wireless chips from a belligerent adult though had difficulty doing so. In response, Apple — potentially in accord with executives during Beats — motionless to hindrance a project. Variety reports that Beats had hoped to sell a initial orator for around $750, concede it to play song in sync with other wireless speakers, and simply start playback off of a phone regulating NFC.

It’s been utterly clear that what Apple essentially wanted from Beats was a streaming song use (and some of a executives). What Apple skeleton to do with Beats’ hardware business stays to be seen. For a many part, there haven’t been a flurry of new products from Beats — mostly only some new headphone colors. The termination of this project, that could have non-stop a renouned code adult to a vast new income stream, seems to pronounce to Apple’s contempt for Beats’ hardware (Tim Cook told The New Yorker last year, “You’re not shopping it for what it is — you’re shopping it for what it can be”). But a hardware creates money. Headphones are a renouned accessory, and Sonos is clearly doing well. Perhaps now that it’s underneath Apple, a second try during wireless speakers by Beats could have a some-more successful outcome.

  • SourceVariety
  • Related Items



    wireless speaker


    home audio

0 340

Though Apple is entrance from behind, we trust it will fast browbeat a marketplace and a smaller rivals will have to step adult their games or get swept away.

Spotify has had an open personification margin given it launched in 2011 though it will have a really tough time competing with a association that controls hardware, program and user information and has $160 billion in cash. Spotify now has 20 million paid subscribers and 55 million giveaway users, so it might be means to play second fiddle. But, one day, Spotify will need to indeed make money. Apple doesn’t need to make income from offered music. That gives it a vital advantage.

Read MoreNo need to be attention series one, says Spotify founder

Rhapsody will many expected spin an merger aim for another association that can use song to sell associated products or it could be acquired to join a apartment of services. Or it will blur away.

Tidal, that launched in late March, heightened recognition in a media, and sent a summary that song streaming was here to stay. Rap star Jay Z purchased Swedish streaming association Aspiro and rebranded it as an artist-owned car that would put energy and income behind in musicians’ pockets. Tidal could emanate a business as a informative height and lifestyle end encompassing sports, conform and more. The association wins for hottest launch event, with vital star energy on hand, including Madonna and Jack White. One problem so far: Tidal hasn’t beaten out deals with all a vital labels, including Sony, so it doesn’t have accede to tide catalog song from Jay Z’s possess wife, and co-owner, Beyoncé.

Read MoreApple Music and labels investigated by 2 states

To be sure, a many sparkling elements of song streaming have not even begun. Music, record and amicable connectivity go palm in hand. Over a past 10 years, thousands of rarely artistic people and companies have used record to emanate all and anything we could have dreamed of as a musician.

Yet, until now there had not been a viable height for all of this technology. It is usually a matter of time before Apple invites apps onto Apple Music and expands a song offerings to prove each applicable low-pitched need. With song streaming comes amicable music, encompassing all from collaborative musician sites like Blend.io that let musicians make song together online to Soundcloud whose network of users share mixes and marks facilely or Sevenpop’s practical jukebox where retailers and restaurants concede shoppers to control a playlist.

Apple knows that song is good for offered all solely music. Apple does not need to sell song to make Apple Music successful. It usually needs to keep users in a ecosystem so they buy some-more hardware, apps, and Apple owned products. Once again, Apple will step in and spin a struggling technology, this time streaming music, into a normal for consumers.

Commentary by Joshua Katz is CEO Co-Founder of El Media Group, a tradition song provider, portion a hospitality, sell and gaming industries. Follow him on Twitter @elrecords.

0 248

Apple currently is a story of dual companies: It’s a best of times for a iPhone, and maybe a misfortune of times for a Apple Watch.

The knowledge behind a iPhone’s growth and selling has cemented Apple as one half of a mobile-computing duopoly with Google (ticker: GOOGL). The giddiness behind a selling of a watch, however, is heading some to consternation if Apple’s (AAPL) latest product will finish adult alongside a Newton, the…

0 136

Steve Jobs Justin Sullivan/Getty ImagesSteve Jobs.

See Also

Former Apple CEO and cofounder Steve Jobs had high standards for his employees. This was generally loyal for a pattern team, according to one chairman who formerly worked during Apple.

Jobs didn’t work closely with each group during a association — though he kept tighten tabs on a Human Interaction division.

He met with a group each other Monday, that many deliberate to be a perk. But it also meant a Human Interaction group was constantly underneath vigour to stir Jobs, and they had to work each other weekend to ready for their assembly with him.

Here’s an comment of what those meetings were like, that we listened from a former Apple worker who spoke with another worker on a Human Interaction team:

Every dual weeks, we accommodate with Steve Jobs and it’s on a Monday. So that means each other weekend, we don’t get. No matter what’s going on, either it’s a deadline or new ideas for a future. We have to work each other weekend all a time no matter what … And afterwards we accommodate with him, and he craps on all of it. He competence like one or dual ideas, and customarily he wants we to redo those one or dual ideas. And so that whole subsequent week, you’re redoing those one or dual ideas and entrance adult with new ones. That’s all year, all a time, each dual weeks.

Jobs favourite to exam people, and he had a repute for doing so. There’s an aged gossip that’s told around Apple that pronounced Jobs once common an conveyor with an intern. He asked a novice what he or she did, and that chairman didn’t give a transparent answer by a time a dual had reached their floor. The novice was dismissed shortly after. It’s misleading if that indeed ever happened, though it’s been told around a company, a former Apple worker said. 

Steve Wozniak, a cofounder of Apple who was a tighten crony of Jobs, pronounced that some of his best friends from Apple pronounced they would never work with Jobs again given a chance. 

0 411

Apple’s rather argumentative new store on Manhattan’s tony Upper East Side non-stop for business this weekend, and photos of a remodeled bank exhibit a series of one-off pattern flourishes including a dedicated Beats arrangement wall and a bank vault-turned-VIP room.

Thanks to AppleInsider reader Ryan from Traced Inc.

Apple sell arch Angela Ahrendts was on palm for a store’s grand opening on Saturday, where residents of a abundant area got their initial demeanour during what incited out to be a singular further to a company’s sell empire. The new plcae — housed in a 93-year-old former bank during a dilemma of East 74th Street and Madison Avenue — looks some-more like a boutique than an wiring store.

In one engaging choice, an inset wall with a series of round, wooden “heads” reason a arrangement of Beats headphones that is a initial of a kind. Each span of headphones is connected to an iPhone and accessible for business to try.

Another fact that harkens behind to a building’s story is a wall of phone cases, with a singular box of any form displayed on a extending wooden lumber that also functions as a handle. Pulling on a hoop reveals a drawer with cases for sale in slots behind a drawer — a pattern component apparently meant to elicit a wall of protected deposition boxes.

Downstairs, a aged bank safe has been left in place and converted into a VIP room with couches, a vast television, and laptops and iPhones displayed along a wall. The safe will reportedly be used to horde Apple Watch Edition try-on appointments.

While many area residents were against a thought of a new store, Apple has done a series of concessions to assistance a latest opening mix in. The association brought behind a personal selling use to support to a new location’s some-more upscale clientele, scaled behind a customarily brightly-lit extraneous signage, and introduced shorter opening hours.

0 394

Flipboard CEO Mike McCueBrian Ach/Getty

See Also

Earlier this week, Apple debuted a new app called News that’s entrance to iPhones with a subsequent vast iPhone update, iOS 9.

Apple’s News app is radically a news-curation use identical to Flipboard — it looks like a digital repository and pulls in news articles and videos formed on your interests.

Flipboard’s CEO, however, doesn’t consider his association has most to worry about.

“What Apple was display is something that we indeed shipped 5 years ago,” Mike McCue, a CEO of Flipboard, pronounced when vocalization on BBC Radio’s Tech Tent podcast. 

McCue went on to contend that given a marketplace is so competitive, we have to be means to work with a same companies we contest opposite in certain situations.

McCue founded Flipboard in 2010 with former Apple iPhone operative Evan Doll.

Since then, we’ve seen a ton of companies vast and tiny perplexing to get into a news-curation space, such as Facebook that launched an app called Paper in 2014. Paper isn’t accurately like Flipboard, though it does curate news formed on your interests and combines that with your Facebook Newsfeed updates. 

“We were clearly onto something,” McCue pronounced to a BBC.