In July, New York administrator Andrew Cuomo sealed a check that would free delicate hygiene products from state and internal sales taxes given they are required medical items. The law went into outcome today, though wouldn’t we know it: Sales taxation is still being charged on tampons and pads during mixed Duane Reade locations in New York City.
New York led a approach this year in expelling a sales taxation on
products, it is unsatisfactory to see that stores like Duane Reade never
got a memo,” romantic Jennifer Weiss-Wolf told a Cut. “Each day a taxation stays in effect, a state continues to
distinction off a periods,” says Weiss-Wolf, author of the
forthcoming book Periods Gone Public.
Duane Reade couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
Update: Women have tweeted profits that uncover New York CVS Pharmacy stores are not charging taxation on these items. Governor Cuomo common a recover saying that a grant went into outcome today, 30 days after all retailers were sensitive of a change. Any New Yorker charged a taxation starting currently can request for a refund.
Michel Sapin a toujours eu le sens de la formule, parfois un peu moins celui de la mesure. Invité de RMC et BFM-TV jeudi 1er septembre, le nouveau ministre de l’économie et des finances a dressé un tableau très optimiste de la conditions économique et sociale du pays, vantant les baisses d’impôts de 2015 et promettant de nouvelles l’an prochain.
Ce qu’il a dit :
En 2010-2013, on a utilisé l’impôt flow régler les problèmes. Depuis 2014,nous rendons aux Français le fruit de leurs efforts #BourdinDirect
— MichelSapin (@Michel Sapin)
M. Sapin explique donc que dans une séquence qu’il situe – sans doute pas totalement standard hasard – entre 2010 et 2013, c’est-à-dire à cheval entre la fin de mandat de M. Sarkozy et le début de celui de M. Hollande, les impôts ont augmenté « pour régler les problèmes ». Mais que, depuis cette date, le gouvernement cherche à diminuer les prélèvements obligatoires afin de « rendre aux Français les fruits de leurs efforts ».
Pourquoi c’est faux
A première vue, M. Sapin ne décrit pas quelque chose de totalement faux. Sur le graphique ci-dessous figure le taux de prélèvement obligatoire, en partial de PIB, depuis 2002.
On le voit, celui-ci a connu une légère mitigation en 2015, de 0,1 point. Qui est toutefois loin de compenser la hausse constatée depuis 2011 (+ 2,1 points). Ou même celle observée depuis 2012 (+ 0,9 point). Dit autrement, flow commencer à « rendre aux Français les fruits de leurs efforts » depuis 2010, il faudra à ce rythme une vingtaine d’années.
Mais soyons and précis : le taux de prélèvement obligatoire agrège tous les impôts et taxes, y compris celles payées standard les entreprises. Qu’en est-il flow les seuls impôts des ménages ?
Une étude de l’Office français des conjonctures économiques (OFCE), parue en octobre 2015, dresse un tableau bien and staid que la prophesy développée standard M. Sapin : elle démontre que ce qui a diminué depuis 2014, ce sont les prélèvements obligatoires… des entreprises. Ceux des ménages, eux, ont continué leur hausse, qui devrait se poursuivre cette année. L’OFCE écrit ainsi :
« Sur la période 2010-2016, les prélèvements obligatoires sur les ménages augmenteraient de 66 milliards d’euros (3,1 points de PIB) et ceux sur les entreprises de 8 milliards (0,4 point de PIB). »
M. Sapin ne peut donc pas affirmer comme il le fait que le gouvernement a « rendu les fruits de leurs efforts » aux Français : depuis 2010, ce sont and de 60 milliards d’euros supplémentaires qui leur ont été prélevés. Et ils ne leur seront pas rendus immédiatement.
L’OFCE précise d’ailleurs que le taux de prélèvement sur les ménages atteindra en 2016 un « plus-haut historique », quand celui des entreprises reviendra cette année à son niveau d’avant la crise de 2008.
Plus de RER annulé, de ligne 13 bondée, de toux qui dure des mois à means de la pollution, de bouchons sur le périph’ et… de Parisiens mécontents ! Une étude menée standard Cadremploi démontre que les Franciliens sont encore et toujours nombreux à rêver de quitter la capitale flow aller vivre et travailler en province. 56 % des cadres d’Ile-de-France seraient partants flow tenter l’aventure.
Et flow aller où ? C’est Bordeaux (comme l’an passé) qui aurait leur préférence et ce, même si c’est la grande ville dont le prix de l’immobilier a le and augmenté en France en un an (+ 7,1 %). La faute notamment à l’attrait accru de la ville avec l’arrivée prochaine de la ligne à grande vitesse Paris-Bordeaux (le trajet passant de 3h15 à 2h05). La LGV doit entrer en fonction à l’été 2017. Derrière Bordeaux, Lyon, Nantes, Toulouse et Montpellier complètent le tip 5.
54 % acceptent une baisse de salaire
Mais qu’est-ce qui les pousse précisément à vouloir partir et éloigner de l’Île-de-France ? Le temps perdu dans les transports (70 % des personnes interrogées), le coût du logement (57 %) et la wickedness (55 %) arrivent en tête des arguments mis en avant flow expliquer cette envie d’ailleurs. Il faut apocalyptic que, parmi les 3700 personnes sondées, 44% ont un temps de ride domicile-travail supérieur à 45 minutes.
Pour certains, le ras-le-bol est tel qu’ils sont prêts à quelques concessions flow une strive meilleure en province. 83 % acceptent de faire des efforts : baisse de salaire (54 %), reconversion professionnelle (48 %), niveau de poste moins élevé (36 %) voire même éloignement temporaire de la famille (32 %), le temps de s’établir.
Méthodologie : l’enquête a été réalisée du 7 au 12 juillet standard petition en ligne auprès de 3 689 cadres parisiens inscrits sur le site internet de Cadremploi.
A lire aussi :
L’infographie du jour : 15 % des Français envisagent de déménager cette année
Jack Dorsey has been behind as Twitter’s C.E.O. for about a year, and while some things have altered underneath his leadership—the association is now creation a large pull into video—others have not. The company’s many new gain news during a finish of Jul fell brief of expectations, with Twitter posting a $107 million net detriment on $602 million in sales. It also forked to near-stagnant user growth, a problem that’s tormented a association for years. If Dorsey can’t work some sorcery with Twitter, if this pull into live video doesn’t work and there’s zero to uncover for it, what can be done? “There is no devise B,” Twitter executives have said, though that’s not utterly true: a association could still sell.
In fact, copiousness of investors are anticipating it will. Twitter’s batch jumped on Wednesday, and again Thursday morning, amid conjecture that a social-media association could be a takeover target, stirred by a vehement acknowledgement from Twitter co-founder Ev Williams. “We’re in a clever position now,” Williams told Bloomberg in an talk when asked about a destiny of a association as an eccentric entity. “And as a house member we have to cruise a right options.” This sent investors into a frenzy, and not for a initial time: final month, rumors swirled that former Microsoft C.E.O. Steve Ballmer and Saudi king Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud were creation a takeover bid for a company. The gossip was dismissed, though not before Twitter’s batch shot adult 9 percent.
Twitter has struggled to tempt new users and sell ads on a platform, even after a heralded lapse of co-founder Jack Dorsey as C.E.O. For a improved partial of a past year, critics have pronounced an merger could be one approach for Twitter to solve a problems. But it stays misleading who would wish to buy a 10-year-old business. Google’s Larry Page doesn’t seem really interested, and while Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg has attempted twice to buy Twitter, he substantially wouldn’t wish to get into a behest fight for it now, generally now that he’s holding on live news and video on his possess platform, that has an assembly an sequence of bulk incomparable than Twitter’s.
Still, only as Verizon recently bought adult Yahoo, copiousness of bequest media companies could be meddlesome in appropriation a young-ish digital-media platform. And investors, who have watched Twitter’s batch trend inexorably downward in a 3 years given a I.P.O., are interesting a prospect. As boilerplate as Williams’s summary was—of march a company’s house is thankful to cruise each option, including interesting a idea of rough takeover bids—Twitter’s batch leapt 5.8 percent on Wednesday as a result, and another 3 percent or so during a opening bell on Thursday.
Twice a year, Y Combinator, a startup accelerator formed in Mountain View, California, binds what it calls a Demo Day, that is a showcase of a latest collection of new companies it has nurtured. In a past, those have enclosed Dropbox, Airbnb, and Reddit (as good as a series of companies no one remembers). Last week, during a many new Demo Day, Eva Shang took to a theatre to speak about her startup, Legalist.
Dressed in jeans and a black T-shirt emblazoned with Legalist’s logo, Shang, who forsaken out of Harvard to concentration on her startup with a classmate, spent her allotted dual and a half mins revelation a Demo Day assembly about Legalist’s business model. Using an algorithm to calculate a odds that a lawsuit will succeed, a association afterwards invests in cases it deems promising. If a plaintiff it has saved prevails, Legalist takes a commission of a winnings—usually between twenty-five and thirty per cent. The algorithm considers, among other things, a distance of a presiding judge’s caseload, that is an indicator of how prolonged a hearing will take, and a judge’s past decisions, that is an indicator of how he or she competence rule.
The thought of a Silicon Valley-funded litigation-finance association immediately dumbfounded a series of journalists. Shang’s presentation, after all, came customarily a day after Gawker Media shuttered a flagship Web site as a approach outcome of a failure stemming from a Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel’s tip financing of lawsuits opposite a company. The clarity of alarm was heightened by a fact that Legalist has financial ties to Thiel. In June, Shang was among twenty-nine recipients of a hundred-thousand-dollar brotherhood from a Thiel Foundation, that supports immature people who eschew college in preference of entrepreneurship. Shang’s initial clarity of what that brotherhood competence cost her came shortly after her Demo Day presentation, when she beheld that it was Thiel, not Legalist, who drew all a headlines. “Most of a articles about my Y Combinator presentation used a design of Peter Thiel instead of me,” Shang told me. “I’ve never even met a guy.”
At Vice’s Motherboard site, Jason Koebler wrote that Legalist is “planning on weaponizing weaknesses in a courts complement regulating chronological lawsuit information as an investing opportunity.” The article’s title claimed that a startup was “Automating a Lawsuit Strategy Peter Thiel Used to Kill Gawker.” At Business Insider, Biz Carson called Legalist “a startup thought that looks like it’s ripped true from a headlines.”
In reality, however, there is tiny new about what Legalist does. Commercial lawsuit financial began in a late nineties and has gradually grown into a three-billion-dollar attention dominated by large banks and sidestep funds. The lenders they behind tend to financial class-action, medical-malpractice, and personal-injury lawsuits that have a good possibility of finale in a financial award, though not though outward appropriation to cover consultant witnesses, investigators, or a kinds of fees that raise adult when a rich suspect attempts to stall. The earnings can be significant: in 2010, a Citigroup-backed financial company secured an eleven-million-dollar distinction on a thirty-five-million-dollar investment in lawsuits brought by workers who grown illnesses after operative during Ground Zero following a Sep 11, 2001, militant attacks. For plaintiffs, annual seductiveness rates as high as fifteen or even twenty per cent can make lawsuit financial a dear trail to justice. In 2010, for instance, the New York Times reported that a lady harmed in a 1995 automobile collision finished adult overdue lenders some fifty thousand dollars some-more than her allotment after a box was resolved. But, given a financing of lawsuits is deliberate an item squeeze and not a loan by regulators, plaintiffs and attorneys, both of whom can find outward financing, compensate their backers customarily if a fit is successful. And infrequently third-party appropriation is a customarily chance for plaintiffs with tiny money, according to Anthony Sebok, a litigation-finance consultant and law highbrow during a Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
“It’s not an collision that a vital polite rights case, NAACP v. Button (1963), involved a right of a third celebration to support litigation,” Sebok recently told me in an e-mail. Before a Supreme Court’s preference in that case, that prevented Virginia from restraint a N.A.A.C.P.’s efforts to assistance internal victims of secular discrimination, laws opposite third-party appropriation of lawsuits were selectively practical to civil-rights groups, Sebok said.
The attention has been growing. In May, Burford Capital, that calls itself a world’s largest provider of financial for lawsuit and arbitration, announced that twenty-eight per cent of private-practice lawyers it surveyed pronounced their firms have used lawsuit financial directly—a fourfold boost given 2013.
The irony of headlines that advise Peter Thiel invented lawsuit finance is that Silicon Valley has been late to deposit in a industry. In fact, until a few years ago, when a Jumpstart Our Business Startups (or JOBS) Act loosened certain bonds regulations, it was all though unfit for try collateral or crowdfunding investors to attend in a industry. But given that law passed, others have been pier in. Shortly before Legalist launched, in 2014, Anoush Hakimi, a lawyer, co-founded a crowdfunding site called Trial Funder. (Its motto: “Litigation is a good investment.”) Hakimi wouldn’t plead a sum of Trial Funder’s algorithm though told me it’s used to name a best probable cases from a pool of intensity suits that are brought to a company, customarily by attorneys. Trial Funder allows people to deposit in any series of cases, many of that have a social-justice element, for as tiny as fifty or a hundred dollars. One plaintiff, for instance, incited to Trial Funder for dual thousand dollars to assistance account a lawsuit alleging that he was a plant of a racially encouraged assault.
“Deep-pocketed defendants have figured out how to diversion a complement by burying plaintiffs in paper, filing fit after fit until they are on their knees and peaceful to accept any allotment that’s offered,” Hakimi told me. “That, in my view, does not paint probity or what a complement was dictated to do.”
Not everybody agrees with this view. Lisa A. Rickard, a boss of a U.S. Chamber of Commerce, argued in a Times, in May, that lawsuit financial is “a carcenogenic expansion on a polite probity system” that encourages some-more lawsuits and turns “our courts into distinction centers.”
Big businesses, like those represented by a Chamber of Commerce, can be approaching to hatred lawsuit finance, though a arise for a opinion square was Thiel’s appropriation of a Gawker suit. When we asked Hakimi how he felt about Thiel’s fight on Gawker, he pronounced he didn’t see anything wrong with it. But he did indicate out that, distinct Thiel, Trial Funder lists information about a cases it backs on a Web site. And Legalist, Shang told me, requires that both plaintiffs and attorneys pointer a contracts, so that all parties are wakeful of a terms of a financing.
Shang, who was desirous to work full time on a association after a summer pursuit in a open defender’s bureau in Washington, D.C., said that Legalist’s concentration will be on blurb and small-business lawsuits. She pronounced she couldn’t criticism on a box Legalist is now funding—its first—but she gave as an instance an tangible contractor that a startup is considering. The plaintiff is a tiny bakery that sued a word association for refusing to cover indemnification caused by a detonate H2O pipe. “Without third-party funding, a word association can box until a bakery goes out of business or becomes unfortunate adequate to accept a tiny settlement,” Shang said. “Funding from a association like Legalist allows a bakery to keep profitable their lawyers and have their day in court.”
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—President Barack Obama shielded his preference on Wednesday to emanate a remuneration of 5 billion dollars to Mexico to enforce that republic to keep control of Donald J. Trump.
The payment, that will be delivered to a Mexican supervision in tough American banking by Wednesday afternoon, will protection that Trump will sojourn in Mexico for a rest of his healthy life.
“I have been positive by a supervision of Mexico that Mr. Trump will be good taken caring of and, if he proves to be a prolific member of their society, will be supposing a pathway to Mexican citizenship,” Obama said.
While a send of supports to Mexico sparked howls of criticism from some Trump supporters, it was hailed by congressional Democrats, as good as by over a hundred Republicans now using for reëlection, including Arizona Senator John McCain.
The President bristled during a idea that profitable Mexico to keep Trump was “reverse ransom” and an impracticable use of taxpayer money. “There is usually one accurate word for this payment: a bargain,” he said.
In following adult on final month’s recover of “Nobody Speak,” in visible form, Run a Jewels are behind with nonetheless another delivery. This time they have partnered with Gears of War 4 to entrance a new track.
The strain is patrician “Panther Like a Panther,” and it will be featured on a hip-hop tandem’s expected third studio album, Run a Jewels 3. Again, a initial ambience of a new song arrives in a premiere trailer for Gears of War 4‘s Horde 3.0.
“Run a Jewels was on complicated revolution when we started laying a grounds for a subsequent epoch of Gears behind in 2014, and has been there ever since.” pronounced Rod Fergusson, Studio Head during The Coalition. “The fact that dual career artists came together as a organisation to emanate something so special – a monument in complicated hip-hop – are things that Gears fans will immediately commend and appreciate. We’re unapproachable to have Run a Jewels as a partial of a Gears of War family.”
In further to carrying their song connected with a stirring Gears of War 4 video game, Killer Mike and El-P will also seem as multiplayer characters in a release.
Be on a surveillance for some-more from Run a Jewels 3, and don’t forget, Gears of War 4 launches for Xbox One and Windows 10 platforms on Oct 11.